California Statutes
§ 950.6. — 950.6. (Amended by Stats. 1970, Ch. 104.)
California § 950.6.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code GOVGovernment Code - GOV
Div.3.6.
Title 1.DIVISION 3.6. CLAIMS AND ACTIONS AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITIES AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
Part 4.PART 4. ACTIONS AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITIES AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
Ch. 3.CHAPTER 3. Actions Against Public Employees
This text of California § 950.6. (950.6. (Amended by Stats. 1970, Ch. 104.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Government Code - GOV Code § 950.6. (2026).
Text
When a written claim for money or damages for injury has been presented to the employing public entity:
(a)A cause of action for such injury may not be maintained against the public employee or former public employee whose act or omission caused such injury until the claim has been rejected, or has been deemed to have been rejected, in whole or in part by the public entity.
(b)A suit against the public employee or former public employee for such injury must be commenced within the time prescribed by Section 945.6 for bringing an action against the public entity.
(c)When a person is unable to commence the suit within the time prescribed in subdivision (b) because he has been sentenced to imprisonment in a state prison, the time limited for the commencement of such suit is extended to six
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ramachandran v. City of L. Altos
359 F. Supp. 3d 801 (N.D. California, 2019)
Guzman v. Van Demark
651 F. Supp. 1180 (C.D. California, 1987)
99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1490, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1910 David Minton Silva v. Andy Crain Michael Rotkin, in His Official Capacity as Mayor City of Santa Cruz
169 F.3d 608 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
(PC) Robertson v. John Latorraca Correctional Facility
(E.D. California, 2024)
Shultz v. Kern County
(E.D. California, 2022)
Carbajal v. Fresno Police Department
(E.D. California, 2022)
(PC) Landis v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
(E.D. California, 2024)
(PC) Gonzalez v. Wise
(E.D. California, 2024)
(PC) Murphy v. Rudas
(E.D. California, 2020)
(PC) Candler v. Arya
(E.D. California, 2020)
(PC) Mwasi v. Lucken
(E.D. California, 2022)
(PC) Henderson v. Castillo
(E.D. California, 2022)
(PC) Bahena v. Mendoza
(E.D. California, 2023)
(PC) Mwasi v. Shittu
(E.D. California, 2023)
(PC) King v. Allison
(E.D. California, 2023)
(PC) Drake v. McComas
(E.D. California, 2022)
(PC) Harrison v. Campbell
(E.D. California, 2023)
(PC) See v. Rivas
(E.D. California, 2023)
Bowers v. City of Porterville
(E.D. California, 2024)
Arrellano v. Sonoma County
(N.D. California, 2024)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 1970, Ch. 104.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 95000.
95000. (Amended (as added by Stats. 1993, Ch. 945, Sec. 4) by Stats. 2004, Ch. 183, Sec. 184.)§ 95003.
95003. (Amended (as added by Stats. 1993, Ch. 945, Sec. 4) by Stats. 2012, Ch. 438, Sec. 5.)Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 950.6., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/GOV/950.6..