California Statutes
§ 669. — 669. (Added by Stats. 1967, Ch. 650.)
California § 669.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code EVIDEvidence Code - EVID
Div. 5.DIVISION 5. BURDEN OF PROOF; BURDEN OF PRODUCING EVIDENCE; PRESUMPTIONS AND INFERENCES
Ch. 3.CHAPTER 3. Presumptions and Inferences
Art. 4.ARTICLE 4. Presumptions Affecting the Burden of Proof
This text of California § 669. (669. (Added by Stats. 1967, Ch. 650.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Evidence Code - EVID Code § 669. (2026).
Text
(a)The failure of a person to exercise due care is presumed if:
(1)He violated a statute, ordinance, or regulation of a public entity;
(2)The violation proximately caused death or injury to person or property;
(3)The death or injury resulted from an occurrence of the nature which the statute, ordinance, or regulation was designed to prevent; and
(4)The person suffering the death or the injury to his person or property was one of the class of persons for whose protection the statute, ordinance, or regulation was adopted.
(b)This presumption may be rebutted by proof that:
(1)The person violating the statute, ordinance, or regulation did what might reasonably be expected of a person of ordinary prudence, acting under similar circumstances, who desired to comply with the law; or
(2)The
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Grancare v. Ruth Thrower
889 F.3d 543 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Maddox v. City of Los Angeles
792 F.2d 1408 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Rosalyn BROOKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DESERT HOSPITAL CORP., Defendant-Appellee, California Medical Association, Amicus
947 F.2d 412 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Michelle Gilstrap v. United Air Lines, Inc.
709 F.3d 995 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Delta Savings Bank v. United States
265 F.3d 1017 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Steering Committee v. United States of America, and Aeromexico
6 F.3d 572 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Garcia Ex Rel. Marin v. Clovis Unified School District
627 F. Supp. 2d 1187 (E.D. California, 2009)
Ronald Roy Henderson v. United States
784 F.2d 942 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Edward H. Gonzales, Individually, and Mark E. Gonzales and Karen A. Gonzales, Minors, by Edward H. Gonzales, Their Next Friend v. United States
589 F.2d 465 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)
Steinle v. City & County of San Francisco
230 F. Supp. 3d 994 (N.D. California, 2017)
Schaeffer v. Gregory Village Partners, L.P.
105 F. Supp. 3d 951 (N.D. California, 2015)
Henderson v. United States
827 F.2d 1233 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Sierra Pacific Industries
879 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (E.D. California, 2012)
Bureerong v. Uvawas
959 F. Supp. 1231 (C.D. California, 1997)
Kilmer v. Medtronic, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2021)
Walker v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
(N.D. California, 2020)
Araujo v. Coachella Valley Water District
(S.D. California, 2022)
Dutch Girl Plaza LLC v. Marathon Petroleum Corporation
(N.D. California, 2025)
Mason H. Rose v. United States
988 F.2d 121 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
S&S Worldwide, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
(N.D. California, 2020)
Legislative History
Added by Stats. 1967, Ch. 650.
Nearby Sections
3
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 669., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/EVID/669..