California Statutes

§ 669.1. — 669.1. (Repealed and added by Stats. 1987, Ch. 1207, Sec. 2.)

California·Code EVID Evidence Code - EVID·Div. 5. DIVISION 5. BURDEN OF PROOF; BURDEN OF PRODUCING EVIDENCE; PRESUMPTIONS AND INFERENCES·Ch. 3. CHAPTER 3. Presumptions and Inferences·Art. 4. ARTICLE 4. Presumptions Affecting the Burden of Proof
A rule, policy, manual, or guideline of state or local government setting forth standards of conduct or guidelines for its employees in the conduct of their public employment shall not be considered a statute, ordinance, or regulation of that public entity within the meaning of Section 669, unless the rule, manual, policy, or guideline has been formally adopted as a statute, as an ordinance of a local governmental entity in this state empowered to adopt ordinances, or as a regulation by an agency of the state pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), or by an agency of the United States government pursuant to the federal Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 5001) of

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

California § 669.1. (669.1. (Repealed and added by Stats. 1987, Ch. 1207, Sec. 2.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maddox v. City of Los Angeles
792 F.2d 1408 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
102 case citations
Streit v. County of Los Angeles
236 F.3d 552 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
79 case citations
Peter H. Doggett v. United States
875 F.2d 684 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
38 case citations
Steinle v. City & County of San Francisco
230 F. Supp. 3d 994 (N.D. California, 2017)
11 case citations
Ellen v. United States
32 F. App'x 270 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
3 case citations
William Espinoza, Jr. v. Stanley Sniff
694 F. App'x 575 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)

Legislative History

Repealed and added by Stats. 1987, Ch. 1207, Sec. 2.

Nearby Sections

3
View on official source ↗