California Statutes
§ 473. — (Repealed (in Sec. 12) and added by Stats. 2025, Ch. 563, Sec. 13.)
California § 473.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code CCPCode of Civil Procedure - CCP
Title6.
Part 2.TITLE 6. OF THE PLEADINGS IN CIVIL ACTIONS
Ch. 8.CHAPTER 8. Variance—Mistakes in Pleadings and Amendments
This text of California § 473. ((Repealed (in Sec. 12) and added by Stats. 2025, Ch. 563, Sec. 13.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Code of Civil Procedure - CCP Code § 473. (2026).
Text
(a)
(1)The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading or proceeding by adding or striking out the name of any party, or by correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect; and may, upon like terms, enlarge the time for answer or demurrer. The court may likewise, in its discretion, after notice to the adverse party, allow, upon any terms as may be just, an amendment to any pleading or proceeding in other particulars; and may upon like terms allow an answer to be made after the time limited by this code.
(2)When it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the amendment renders it necessary, the court may postpone the trial, and may, when the
postponement will by the amendment be rend
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Zina Butler v. Housing Auth. County of La
766 F.3d 1191 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Austin v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. CA2/7
244 Cal. App. 4th 918 (California Court of Appeal, 2016)
In Re Marriage of Zimmerman
183 Cal. App. 4th 900 (California Court of Appeal, 2010)
Fasuyi v. Permatex, Inc.
167 Cal. App. 4th 681 (California Court of Appeal, 2008)
Talley v. Valuation Counselors Group, Inc.
191 Cal. App. 4th 132 (California Court of Appeal, 2010)
Ron Burns Construction Co. v. Moore
184 Cal. App. 4th 1406 (California Court of Appeal, 2010)
Watkins v. County of Los Angeles CA2/1
(California Court of Appeal, 2015)
Valdez v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
(S.D. California, 2021)
Mayer Amschel Rothschild v. The Pacific Companies
(N.D. California, 2025)
Eloy Mascorro v. The City of San Diego, et al.
(S.D. California, 2025)
Goossen v. Daily CA2/3
(California Court of Appeal, 2021)
Romo v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. CA2/3
(California Court of Appeal, 2021)
Redick III v. County of Tuolumne
(E.D. California, 2025)
Gee v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
(California Court of Appeal, 2016)
Gee v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
210 Cal. Rptr. 3d 440 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2016)
Troy v. G. De Cohen, Inc. CA2
(California Court of Appeal, 2022)
Padilla v. Jakubaitis CA4/3
(California Court of Appeal, 2015)
Austin v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.
(California Court of Appeal, 2016)
Reiter v. C.Martin Co. CA1/2
(California Court of Appeal, 2015)
Earle & Reimer APC v. Klimek CA6
(California Court of Appeal, 2016)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2025, Ch. 563, Sec. 12. (AB 747) Effective January 1, 2026. Repealed as of January 1, 2027, by its own provisions. See later operative version added by Sec. 13 of Stats. 2025, Ch. 563.
Nearby Sections
4
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 473., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/CIV/473..