California Statutes
§ 3439.08. — 3439.08. (Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 44, Sec. 10.)
California·Code CIV Civil Code - CIV·Div. 4. DIVISION 4. GENERAL PROVISIONS·Title 2.·Part 2. TITLE 2. VOID AND VOIDABLE TRANSFERS AND UNDERTAKINGS·Ch. 1. CHAPTER 1. Uniform Voidable Transactions Act
(a)A transfer or obligation is not voidable under paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 3439.04, against a person that took in good faith and for a reasonably equivalent value given the debtor or against any subsequent transferee or obligee.
(b)To the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under paragraph (1)
of subdivision (a) of Section 3439.07, the following rules apply:
(1)Except as otherwise provided in this section, the creditor may recover judgment for the value of the asset transferred, as adjusted under subdivision (c), or the amount necessary to satisfy the creditor’s claim, whichever is less. The judgment may be entered against the following:
(A)The first transferee of the asset or the person for whose benefit the transfer was made.
(B)An immediate
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 3439.08. (3439.08. (Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 44, Sec. 10.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Donell v. Kowell
533 F.3d 762 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Decker v. Tramiel (In Re JTS Corp.)
617 F.3d 1102 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
In Re AFI Holding, Inc.
525 F.3d 700 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc. v. Spitters (In Re Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc.)
174 B.R. 557 (N.D. California, 1994)
Bay Plastics, Inc. v. BT Commercial Corp. (In Re Bay Plastics, Inc.)
187 B.R. 315 (C.D. California, 1995)
Tatung Co. v. Shu Tze Hsu
217 F. Supp. 3d 1138 (C.D. California, 2016)
In Re Rheuban
128 B.R. 551 (C.D. California, 1991)
Qwest Communications Corp. v. Weisz
278 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (S.D. California, 2003)
Uecker v. Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC
527 B.R. 351 (N.D. California, 2015)
Cybermedia, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.
19 F. Supp. 2d 1070 (N.D. California, 1998)
Rodgers v. Monaghan Co. (In re Laguna Beach Motors, Inc.)
159 B.R. 562 (C.D. California, 1993)
Decker v. Tramiel
617 F.3d 1102 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Unit 53 v. PACT Capital, et al.
(E.D. California, 2025)
TMCO, Ltd v. Brodsky
(N.D. California, 2023)
Freitag v. La Jolla Bridge, LLC
(S.D. California, 2022)
MacKenzie v. Barclay
(Ninth Circuit, 2008)
William Hoffman v. Howard Markowitz
(Ninth Circuit, 2018)
David Abreu v. Brian Weiss
(Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Jeffrey Brandlin v. Eurolux, LLC
(Ninth Circuit, 2022)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 44, Sec. 10. (SB 161) Effective January 1, 2016.