California Statutes
§ 2607. — 2607. (Amended by Stats. 1995, Ch. 91, Sec. 20.)
California·Code COM Commercial Code - COM·Div. 2. DIVISION 2. SALES·Ch. 6. CHAPTER 6. Breach, Repudiation and Excuse
(1)The buyer must pay at the contract rate for any goods accepted.
(2)Acceptance of goods by the buyer precludes rejection of the goods accepted and, if made with knowledge of a nonconformity, cannot be revoked because of it unless the acceptance was on the reasonable assumption that the nonconformity would be seasonably cured. Acceptance does not of itself impair any other remedy provided by this division for nonconformity.
(3)Where a tender has been
accepted:
(A)The buyer must, within a reasonable time after he or she discovers or should have discovered any breach, notify the seller of breach or be barred from any remedy; and
(B)If the claim is one for infringement or the like (subdivision (3) of Section 2312) and the buyer is sued as a result of such a breach, the buyer must so
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 2607. (2607. (Amended by Stats. 1995, Ch. 91, Sec. 20.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation
754 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (C.D. California, 2010)
Tietsworth v. Sears
720 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (N.D. California, 2010)
Sanders v. Apple Inc.
672 F. Supp. 2d 978 (N.D. California, 2009)
Alvarez v. Chevron Corp.
656 F.3d 925 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.
293 F. Supp. 3d 888 (N.D. California, 2018)
Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.
838 F. Supp. 2d 929 (C.D. California, 2012)
Donohue v. Apple, Inc.
871 F. Supp. 2d 913 (N.D. California, 2012)
Cermetek, Inc., a Corporation v. Butler Avpak, Inc., a Corporation
573 F.2d 1370 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
Cortina v. Goya Foods, Inc.
94 F. Supp. 3d 1174 (S.D. California, 2015)
Baranco v. Ford Motor Co.
294 F. Supp. 3d 950 (N.D. California, 2018)
Los Angeles Nut House v. Holiday Hardware Corp.
825 F.2d 1351 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Minkler v. Apple, Inc.
65 F. Supp. 3d 810 (N.D. California, 2014)
Mance v. Mercedes-Benz USA
901 F. Supp. 2d 1147 (N.D. California, 2012)
In re Trader Joe's Tuna Litig.
289 F. Supp. 3d 1074 (C.D. California, 2017)
Rojas v. Bosch Solar Energy Corp.
386 F. Supp. 3d 1116 (N.D. California, 2019)
Lengen v. General Mills, Inc.
185 F. Supp. 3d 1213 (E.D. California, 2016)
Yamada v. Nobel Biocare Holding AG
275 F.R.D. 573 (C.D. California, 2011)
China National Metal Products Import/Export Co. v. Apex Digital, Inc.
141 F. Supp. 2d 1013 (C.D. California, 2001)
Adkins v. Apple Inc.
147 F. Supp. 3d 913 (N.D. California, 2014)
Soil Retention Products, Inc. v. Brentwood Industries, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2022)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 1995, Ch. 91, Sec. 20. Effective January 1, 1996.