Arizona Statutes
§ 13-409 — Justification; use of physical force in law enforcement
Arizona § 13-409
This text of Arizona § 13-409 (Justification; use of physical force in law enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-409 (2026).
Text
A person is justified in threatening or using physical force against another if in making or assisting in making an arrest or detention or in preventing or assisting in preventing the escape after arrest or detention of that other person, such person uses or threatens to use physical force and all of the following exist:
1.A reasonable person would believe that such force is immediately necessary to effect the arrest or detention or prevent the escape.
2.Such person makes known the purpose of the arrest or detention or believes that it is otherwise known or cannot reasonably be made known to the person to be arrested or detained.
3.A reasonable person would believe the arrest or detention to be lawful.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Flores
260 P.3d 309 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2011)
Susan Ryan v. napier/klein
425 P.3d 230 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2018)
Marquez Ex Rel. Marquez v. City of Phoenix
693 F.3d 1167 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Sonoran Desert Investigations, Inc. v. Miller
141 P.3d 754 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2006)
Weekly v. City of Mesa
888 P.2d 1346 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1994)
Pfeil v. Smith
900 P.2d 12 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)
State v. Doss
966 P.2d 1012 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1998)
English-Clark v. City of Tucson
690 P.2d 1235 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1984)
Brailsford v. Foster
393 P.3d 138 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2017)
Rodney Cable v. City of Phoenix
647 F. App'x 780 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
State v. Yoshida
986 P.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1998)
State v. Matthews
428 P.3d 198 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2018)
Betancourt v. Phoenix
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2017)
Coleman v. Tempe, City of
(D. Arizona, 2019)
Glass v. Robinson
(D. Arizona, 2022)
Jade Waichulaitis, et al. v. Michael Sloat, et al.
(D. Arizona, 2025)
Leibel v. Buckeye, City of
(D. Arizona, 2021)
Lucha Unida de Padres y Estudiantes v. Green
(D. Arizona, 2020)
Mesa v. Hon. driggs/charon
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2024)
Parish v. Lansdale
(D. Arizona, 2019)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 13-1001
Attempt; classifications§ 13-1002
Solicitation; classifications§ 13-1003
Conspiracy; classification§ 13-1004
Facilitation; classification§ 13-101
Purposes§ 13-101.01
Additional purposes of the criminal law§ 13-102
Applicability of title§ 13-104
Rule of construction§ 13-105
Definitions§ 13-107
Time limitations§ 13-108
Territorial applicabilityCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Arizona § 13-409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/az/13-409.