Arizona Statutes
§ 13-103 — Abolition of common law offenses and affirmative defenses; definition
Arizona § 13-103
This text of Arizona § 13-103 (Abolition of common law offenses and affirmative defenses; definition) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-103 (2026).
Text
A.All common law offenses and affirmative defenses are abolished. No conduct or omission constitutes an offense or an affirmative defense unless it is an offense or an affirmative defense under this title or under another statute or ordinance.
B.For the purposes of this section, "affirmative defense" means a defense that is offered and that attempts to excuse the criminal actions of the accused or another person for whose actions the accused may be deemed to be accountable. Affirmative defense does not include any justification defense pursuant to chapter 4 of this title or any defense that either denies an element of the offense charged or denies responsibility, including alibi, misidentification or lack of intent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Derendal v. Griffith
104 P.3d 147 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2005)
State v. Bayardi
281 P.3d 1063 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2012)
Garcia v. Browning
151 P.3d 533 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2007)
May v. Ryan
245 F. Supp. 3d 1145 (D. Arizona, 2017)
State Ex Rel. Woods v. Cohen
844 P.2d 1147 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1992)
State of Arizona v. Alan Matthew Champagne
447 P.3d 297 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2019)
Huerta v. Flood
447 P.2d 866 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1968)
Jones v. Sterling
110 P.3d 1271 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2005)
State v. Altamirano
803 P.2d 425 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1990)
State of Arizona v. Maverick Kemp Gray
372 P.3d 999 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2016)
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle
358 P.3d 639 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2015)
City Court of Phoenix v. State ex rel. Baumert
565 P.2d 531 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1977)
Brailsford v. Foster
393 P.3d 138 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2017)
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty., No. Jv-508801
901 P.2d 1205 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)
David Garcia v. State of Arizona
146 P.3d 1007 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2006)
State v. Burr
467 P.2d 784 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1970)
State of Arizona v. Analysya Contreras
557 P.3d 345 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2024)
Lisa Gilpin v. Hon. harris/marcos Martinez
553 P.3d 169 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2024)
Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg
(Arizona Supreme Court, 2024)
State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle
(Arizona Supreme Court, 2016)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 13-1001
Attempt; classifications§ 13-1002
Solicitation; classifications§ 13-1003
Conspiracy; classification§ 13-1004
Facilitation; classification§ 13-101
Purposes§ 13-101.01
Additional purposes of the criminal law§ 13-102
Applicability of title§ 13-104
Rule of construction§ 13-105
Definitions§ 13-107
Time limitations§ 13-108
Territorial applicabilityCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Arizona § 13-103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/az/13-103.