Arkansas Statutes

§ 27-37-703 — Effect of noncompliance

Arkansas·Title 27
(a)(1) The failure of an occupant to wear a properly adjusted and fastened seat belt shall not be admissible into evidence in a civil action.
(2)Provided, that evidence of the failure may be admitted in a civil action as to the causal relationship between noncompliance and the injuries alleged, if the following conditions have been satisfied:
(A)The plaintiff has filed a products liability claim other than a claim related to an alleged failure of a seat belt;
(B)The defendant alleging noncompliance with this subchapter shall raise this defense in its answer or timely amendment thereto in accordance with the rules of civil procedure; and (C) Each defendant seeking to offer evidence alleging noncompliance has the burden of proving:
(i)Noncompliance;
(ii)That compliance would have reduc

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arkansas § 27-37-703 (Effect of noncompliance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lovett v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
201 F.3d 1074 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)
58 case citations
Ford Motor Co. v. Washington
2013 Ark. 510 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2013)
14 case citations
Grummer v. Cummings
986 S.W.2d 91 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1999)
11 case citations
Mendoza v. WIS International, Inc.
2016 Ark. 157 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2016)
11 case citations
Baker v. Morrison
829 S.W.2d 421 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1992)
5 case citations
Allen v. Greenland
65 S.W.3d 424 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2002)
4 case citations
James Carlton Newton v. Ryder Transportation Services, Inc.
206 F.3d 772 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)
3 case citations
Willa Jari Lovett v. Union Pacific RR
201 F.3d 1074 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)
1 case citations
Kroll v. Thomas
(W.D. Arkansas, 2020)

Legislative History

Acts 1991, No. 562, § 5; 1993, No. 1086, § 1; 1995, No. 1118, § 1.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗