Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Znajmiecki v. State

Znajmiecki v. State

569 So. 2d 531, 1990 WL 176042
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 1990·No. 90-746·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

569 So.2d 531 (1990)

Walter ZNAJMIECKI, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 90-746.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 15, 1990.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED on the authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

COWART, J., dissents with opinion.

COWART, Judge, dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons given in the dissent to Flowers v. State. The "legal constraint" factor on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet should not, for any reason, be multiplied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Znajmiecki v. State, 569 So. 2d 531, 1990 WL 176042 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

569 So. 2d 531 (Znajmiecki v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. State
586 So. 2d 1061 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Swinson v. State
579 So. 2d 927 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Taylor v. State
579 So. 2d 405 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Doughty v. State
578 So. 2d 65 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Howarth v. State
578 So. 2d 66 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Ficichy v. State
578 So. 2d 45 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Kelly v. State
578 So. 2d 47 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Isom v. State
578 So. 2d 431 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)