Znajmiecki v. State
This text of 569 So. 2d 531 (Znajmiecki v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Walter ZNAJMIECKI, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED on the authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
COWART, J., dissents with opinion.
COWART, Judge, dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons given in the dissent to Flowers v. State. The "legal constraint" factor on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet should not, for any reason, be multiplied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
569 So. 2d 531, 1990 WL 176042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/znajmiecki-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.