Swinson v. State
This text of 579 So. 2d 927 (Swinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
On the authority of Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) and Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), we affirm the defendant’s sentence which is based on a scoresheet multiplying the points for legal constraint by the number of offenses committed while the defendant was under legal constraint. We certify the following question to be of great public importance (Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v)):
DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
579 So. 2d 927, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5142, 1991 WL 93526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swinson-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.