Parrish v. State
This text of 561 So. 2d 685 (Parrish v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David J. PARRISH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The state concedes, and we agree, that it was error for the trial court to enter judgments of conviction for both driving under the influence (Count I) and driving with an unlawful blood alcohol level (Count II). See State v. Rolle, 560 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 1990). We find no other reversible error by the trial court. Accordingly, we reverse the conviction for Count II and remand with directions that such conviction be vacated, and affirm in all other respects.
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
561 So. 2d 685, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrish-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.