Isom v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Isom v. State

578 So. 2d 431, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3557, 1991 WL 56372

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 1991

DocketNo. 90-1546

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 578 So. 2d 431 (Isom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isom v. State, 578 So. 2d 431, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3557, 1991 WL 56372 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We certify to the supreme court the following question:

IS IT THE INTENT OF THE FLORIDA SENTENCING GUIDELINES THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS UNDER RULE 3.701d.6. BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE THE DEFENDANT WAS UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ„ concur. COWART, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We certify to the supreme court the following question:

IS IT THE INTENT OF THE FLORIDA SENTENCING GUIDELINES THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS UNDER RULE 3.701d.6. BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE THE DEFENDANT WAS UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ„ concur. COWART, J., dissents with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 So. 2d 431, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3557, 1991 WL 56372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isom-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack