Worley v. State
This text of 573 So. 2d 1023 (Worley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ronald WORLEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Elaine L. Thompson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Consistent with our decisions in Lewis v. State, 574 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) and Scott v. State, 574 So.2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), we hold the trial court erred in multiplying the points for legal constraint by the number of new offenses committed by appellant while on probation to arrive at appellant's presumptive guidelines sentence. Accordingly, we reverse appellant's *1024 sentence and remand for correction of the scoresheet and resentencing.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
573 So. 2d 1023, 1991 WL 9378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worley-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.