Howarth v. State
This text of 578 So. 2d 66 (Howarth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We affirm. Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Accord Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Contra Lewis v. State, 574 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
However we certify the following question to the supreme court:
DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
578 So. 2d 66, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3715, 1991 WL 61809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howarth-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.