Howarth v. State

578 So. 2d 66, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3715, 1991 WL 61809
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 25, 1991
DocketNo. 90-491
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 578 So. 2d 66 (Howarth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howarth v. State, 578 So. 2d 66, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3715, 1991 WL 61809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Accord Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Contra Lewis v. State, 574 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

However we certify the following question to the supreme court:

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur. COWART, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyd v. State
587 So. 2d 1311 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 So. 2d 66, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3715, 1991 WL 61809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howarth-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.