Howarth v. State

578 So. 2d 66, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3715, 1991 WL 61809
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 25, 1991·No. No. 90-491·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Accord Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Contra Lewis v. State, 574 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

However we certify the following question to the supreme court:

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur. COWART, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howarth v. State, 578 So. 2d 66, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3715, 1991 WL 61809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

578 So. 2d 66 (Howarth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyd v. State
587 So. 2d 1311 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)