Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

170 S.E.2d 90, 6 N.C. App. 443, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1207
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 22, 1969
DocketNo. 6911SC472
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 170 S.E.2d 90 (Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 170 S.E.2d 90, 6 N.C. App. 443, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1207 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

GRAHAM, J.

The order appealed from was entered 5 May 1969. The record on appeal was docketed in this court 15 August 1969 which was after the expiration of the time within which the appeal could be docketed- in compliance with Rule 5, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. In the record before us there is no order extending the time for docketing the record on appeal. Rule 48, Rules of Practice, supra, provides: “If these rules are not complied with, the appeal may be dismissed.” The practice of .this court has been to dismiss appeals for failure to docket the record on appeal within the time prescribed by Rule 5. Laws v. Palmer, 4 N.C. App. 510, 167 S.E. 2d 49; Coffey v. Vanderbloemen, 4 N.C. App. 504, 167 S.E. 2d 36; State v. Ellisor, 4 N.C. App. 514, 167 S.E. 2d 35; Simmons v. Edwards, 3 N.C. App. 591, 165 S.E. 2d 345; In re Custody of Burchette, 3 N.C. App. 575, 165 S.E. 2d 564; Evangelistic Assoc. v. Bd. of Tax Supervision, 3 N.C. App. 479, 165 S.E. 2d 67; Kelly v. Washington, 3 N.C. App. 362, 164 S.E. 2d 634. Accordingly, the appeal in this case should be and is dismissed, ex mero mota, for failure- to docket within the time fixed by Rule 5.

We have nevertheless carefully considered the contentions of the plaintiff as set forth in his brief. In our opinion the order of Judge [445]*445Hobgood was properly entered, no good cause having been- shown a¡? to why the final judgment should be set aside and- declared void.

Appeal dismissed.

’ Campbell and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brigman
174 S.E.2d 48 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)
State v. Brown
172 S.E.2d 99 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 S.E.2d 90, 6 N.C. App. 443, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-ncctapp-1969.