Robert E. Harris Evangelistic Ass'n v. Board of Tax Supervision

165 S.E.2d 67, 3 N.C. App. 479, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1606
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided January 15, 1969·No. No. 6828SC414·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Parker, J.

The judgment here appealed from was entered 17 May 1968. The record on appeal was doeketed in this Court on 19 September 1968, 125 days after the date of the judgment appealed from. Rule 5 of the Rules of Practice of this Court provides that if the record on appeal is not docketed within ninety days after the date of the judgment appealed from the case may be dismissed under Rule 17; provided the trial tribunal may, for good cause, extend the time not exceeding sixty days. In the record before us there is no order extending the time for docketing the record on appeal. Accordingly, the appeal in this case should be and is dismissed, ex mero motu, for failure to docket within the time fixed by the Rules. Rule 48 of the Rules of Practice of this Court; Carter v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 274 N.C. 484, 164 S.E. 2d 1; Kelly v. Washington, 3 N.C. App. 362, 164 S.E. 2d 634 (filed 31 December 1968); Williams v. Williams, 1 N.C. App. 446, 161 S.E. 2d 757.

Nevertheless, since this case involved a matter concerning the public tax revenues, we have carefully reviewed the entire record and the briefs of the parties and defendant has shown no prejudicial error.

Appeal dismissed.

Brock and Britt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert E. Harris Evangelistic Ass'n v. Board of Tax Supervision, 165 S.E.2d 67, 3 N.C. App. 479, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1606 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

165 S.E.2d 67 (Robert E. Harris Evangelistic Ass'n v. Board of Tax Supervision) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brigman
174 S.E.2d 48 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)
Umphlett v. Bush
171 S.E.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
170 S.E.2d 90 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)