Simmons v. Edwards

165 S.E.2d 345, 3 N.C. App. 591, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1631
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1969·No. No. 682SC317·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Morris, J.

Appellant has failed to comply with Rule 28 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina by his failure to file his brief within the time required. Defendant, in apt time, before the brief was filed, and in accordance with Rule 28, moved to dismiss the appeal. On the day after appellant filed his brief, he filed a petition for extension of time for filing brief to and including the day the brief was actually filed. In addition to noncomplianee with Rule 28, appellant also failed to comply with Rule 5 in that he did not docket his appeal in this Court within the time prescribed. For failure to comply with the Rules of Practice in this Court, the appeal is dismissed. Despite these circumstances, we have examined the record and the evidence presented and we find no error in the ruling of the trial tribunal.

Appeal dismissed.

Mallard, C.J., and Campbell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons v. Edwards, 165 S.E.2d 345, 3 N.C. App. 591, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1631 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

165 S.E.2d 345 (Simmons v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brigman
174 S.E.2d 48 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)
Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
170 S.E.2d 90 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)