Laws v. Palmer

167 S.E.2d 49, 4 N.C. App. 510, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1537
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided April 30, 1969·No. No. 6925DC24·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mallard, C.J.

This case was tried and judgment entered under date of 9 August 1968. The record on appeal was not docketed in the Court of Appeals within the time permitted under Rule- 5 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals. The ninety days allowed in Rule 5 for docketing the record on appeal in this case expired on Thursday, 7 November 1968. The record on appeal was not docketed until 11 November 1968. No order was entered extending the time in which to docket the record on appeal. Under Rule 48, the case is subject to dismissal and should be and is dismissed by this Court ex mero motu for failure to comply with the rules.

However, we have also reviewed the record before us and find no prejudicial error. We think the judgment of the District Court is correct.

Appeal dismissed.

Britt and Pareer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laws v. Palmer, 167 S.E.2d 49, 4 N.C. App. 510, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1537 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

167 S.E.2d 49 (Laws v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brigman
174 S.E.2d 48 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)
Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
170 S.E.2d 90 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)