Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wright v. State

Wright v. State

789 So. 2d 1246, 2001 WL 864174
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 2001·No. 1D00-2653·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

789 So.2d 1246 (2001)

Louie T. WRIGHT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D00-2653.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 1, 2001.

Nancy A Daniels, Public Defender, and Phil Patterson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Felicia A. Wilcox, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert R. Wheeler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Louie Wright was convicted of dealing in stolen property. At trial, the jury was instructed that "[p]ossession of recently stolen property unless satisfactorily explained gives rise to an inference that the person in possession of the property knew or should have known that the property had been stolen." As Appellant concedes, the issue we certified to the supreme court in Weddell v. State, 780 So.2d 324 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), is not preserved in this case.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 789 So. 2d 1246, 2001 WL 864174 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

789 So. 2d 1246 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russell v. State
858 So. 2d 356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Austin v. State
849 So. 2d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Tucker v. State
810 So. 2d 1100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Green v. State
804 So. 2d 1282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)