Wright v. State
721 So. 2d 1253, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16041, 1998 WL 889279
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 705 So. 2d 102 →
Opinion
Appellant, who was a juvenile at the time of the offense, appeals from a negotiated plea agreement in which he was sentenced as an adult. Appellant’s counsel did not contemporaneously object or make a move to withdraw the plea or correct the sentence. Thus, the points raised on appeal are not properly preserved. See Hyden v. State, 715 So.2d 960, 961 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Harriel v. State, 710 So.2d 102, 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Cargle v. State, 701 So.2d 359, 360 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), rev. granted, 717 So.2d 529 (Fla. 1998).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. State, 721 So. 2d 1253, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16041, 1998 WL 889279 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
721 So. 2d 1253 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hyden v. State
715 So. 2d 960 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Harriel v. State
710 So. 2d 102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cargle v. State
701 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)