Wright v. State
691 So. 2d 1140, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4123, 1997 WL 175125
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 1997·No. No. 96-872·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The appellant’s conviction is affirmed, but his habitual felony offender sentences are vacated. As the state concedes, prior offenses for which adjudication was withheld may not serve as a predicate for such habitual offender status where the prior probationary period was completed before the present offense was committed. E.g., Gauthier v. State, 605 So.2d 1284 (Fla.App. 1st DCA 1992). The case is remanded for resentenc-ing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. State, 691 So. 2d 1140, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4123, 1997 WL 175125 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
691 So. 2d 1140 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Castellanos v. State
62 So. 3d 1292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Wright v. State
720 So. 2d 313 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)