Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wright v. State

Wright v. State

659 So. 2d 402, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8016, 1995 WL 443482
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 617 So. 2d 837 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 28, 1995·No. No. 95-1746·Published

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Whether appellant’s application for relief below is treated as a Rule 3.850 motion or a petition for writ of habeas corpus, it is without merit. Appellate counsel was not ineffective.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 659 So. 2d 402, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8016, 1995 WL 443482 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

659 So. 2d 402 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.