Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wright v. State

Wright v. State

606 So. 2d 1287, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11802, 1992 WL 324676
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 579 So. 2d 418 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1992·No. No. 91-2086·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because appellant properly could be treated as an adult under section 39.-047(4)(e)5, Florida Statutes (Supp.1990), we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 606 So. 2d 1287, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11802, 1992 WL 324676 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

606 So. 2d 1287 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)