Wright v. State

570 So. 2d 1135, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9292, 1990 WL 198379
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 1990·No. No. 89-1664·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In conjunction with his arrest for robbery, the sheriffs office confiscated appellant’s personal effects, which included the sum of $499.55. After appellant was sentenced, he filed a motion for return of property, alleging that all of the money taken from the bank robbery was accounted for and had been returned to the proper bank officials, and that the $499.55 taken from him was his private property and not related to any criminal activity. The court denied appellant’s motion without explanation and without a hearing.

Appellant contends that it was error to deny his motion without a hearing and the state concedes the correctness of that contention.

Accordingly, we reverse the order appealed from and remand the cause with directions to grant appellant a hearing on his motion for the return of his property.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 570 So. 2d 1135, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9292, 1990 WL 198379 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

570 So. 2d 1135 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raffone v. Fort Lauderdale Police Department
731 So. 2d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)