Wright v. State

536 So. 2d 1072, 1988 WL 117540
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 9, 1988·No. 87-1096·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

536 So.2d 1072 (1988)

John Angus WRIGHT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1096.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 9, 1988.

Robert Makemson of Robert R. Makemson, P.A., Stuart, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Deborah Guller, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the convictions and life sentences imposed thereon for count I and count II.

We remand the sentencing order entered as to Count III for clarification, because the trial court's oral pronouncement of that five-year sentence was not explicit as to whether it is to be served consecutively or concurrently with the other sentences.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 536 So. 2d 1072, 1988 WL 117540 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

536 So. 2d 1072 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Land v. Allen
573 F.3d 1211 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
Ferguson v. Culliver
527 F.3d 1144 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
John Angus Wright v. Sec. For the Dept. of Correc.
278 F.3d 1245 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)