Raffone v. Fort Lauderdale Police Department

731 So. 2d 94, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4688, 1999 WL 212011
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 1999·No. No. 97-4024·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes that the trial court erred in summarily denying appellant’s motion for return of property. We reverse and remand this matter to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing to determine ownership of the items requested, status and location of the seized property, and a valid basis, if any, for permitting retention of the property by the seizing agency. See Calavenzo v. State, 695 So.2d 857 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Wright v. State, 570 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

KLEIN, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raffone v. Fort Lauderdale Police Department, 731 So. 2d 94, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4688, 1999 WL 212011 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

731 So. 2d 94 (Raffone v. Fort Lauderdale Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKeever v. State
764 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Davidson v. State
751 So. 2d 189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Gutierrez v. State
731 So. 2d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)