Wright v. State

518 So. 2d 475, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 236, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 119, 1988 WL 2372
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1988·No. No. 4-86-1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Although the order appealed erroneously states that the State’s motion to dismiss was granted, this error was not an issue in the appeal. Both parties addressed the issue of the denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss and we affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss.

[476]*476GUNTHER, J., concurs. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion. ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 518 So. 2d 475, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 236, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 119, 1988 WL 2372 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

518 So. 2d 475 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Velasquez
679 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)