Wright v. State
739 So. 2d 682, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11673, 1999 WL 674317
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 705 So. 2d 102 →
Opinion
In this direct criminal appeal, we affirm as to Issue I without further comment. On the second issue, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court, as a matter of great public importance, the same issue that was certified in Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), review granted, No. 94,396 (Fla. Feb. 18, 1999):
DOES THE FAILURE OF THE TRIAL COURT TO ORALLY PRONOUNCE EACH STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED COST INDIVIDUALLY AT THE TIME OF SENTENCING CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. State, 739 So. 2d 682, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11673, 1999 WL 674317 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
739 So. 2d 682 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Locke v. State
719 So. 2d 1249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)