Wright v. State
732 So. 2d 1214, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7275, 1999 WL 345561
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 705 So. 2d 102 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Wnght v. State, 711 So.2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(holding that laches may bar claim for postconviction relief); Smith v. State, 506 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); see also Sanchez v. State, 683 So.2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)(holding that trial court’s denial of motion for postconviction relief was proper where allegations were or could have been made in previous motion).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. State, 732 So. 2d 1214, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7275, 1999 WL 345561 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
732 So. 2d 1214 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sanchez v. State
683 So. 2d 606 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Smith v. State
506 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Wright v. State
711 So. 2d 66 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)