Wilson v. State
404 S.W.3d 901, 2013 WL 1901163, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 556
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1331 →
Opinion
ORDER
Van Wilson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing and denying his motion to quash the amended motion and to disqualify appointed counsel. We find the motion court did not err in denying Wilson’s motions. We affirm.
[902]*902An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. State, 404 S.W.3d 901, 2013 WL 1901163, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
404 S.W.3d 901 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.