Wilson v. State

471 S.W.3d 801, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1019, 2015 WL 5823413
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1331
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 6, 2015·No. No. ED 102622·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kenneth Wilson appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Wilson raises two points on appeal: 1) that trial counsel was ineffective because he was unprepared for trial thereby rendering Wilson’s guilty plea involuntary; and 2) that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to review with Wilson surveillance footage of one of the robberies thereby rendering his plea unknowing. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 471 S.W.3d 801, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1019, 2015 WL 5823413 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

471 S.W.3d 801 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.