Wilson v. State

477 S.W.3d 1, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 509, 2015 WL 2226351
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1331
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 12, 2015·No. No. ED 101216·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kevin P. Wilson (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Con-[2]*2elusions of Law and Judgment on Movant’s Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request . for Evidentiary Hearing denying Movant’s Rule 29.15 claims for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating, the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 477 S.W.3d 1, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 509, 2015 WL 2226351 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

477 S.W.3d 1 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.