Wilson v. State

345 S.W.3d 401, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1068, 2011 WL 3586527
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 2011·No. ED 95322·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James D. Wilson appeals from a judgment in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 345 S.W.3d 401, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1068, 2011 WL 3586527 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

345 S.W.3d 401 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. State
345 S.W.3d 401 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)