Willis v. Celotex Corp.
This text of 970 F.2d 1292 (Willis v. Celotex Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
970 F.2d 1292w
61 USLW 2079, 22 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1256,
Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,695
Daniel A. WILLIS; Carolyn W. Willis; Herman L. Mensing,
Jr.; Frances K. Mensing; Vincent H. Lewis; Ruby
B. Lewis; Elwood F. Hamlet; Lois D.
Hamlet, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
and
Richard L. Taylor; Mary S. Taylor; William F. Cobb;
Lillie P. Cobb; Roy B. Bass; Susan R. Bass, Plaintiffs,
v.
The CELOTEX CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation; Eagle-Picher
Industries, Inc.; Armstrong World Industries, Inc.; GAF
Corporation; Keene Corporation; Standard Insulations,
Inc.; Raymark Industries, Inc.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.;
H.K. Porter Company, Inc.; Fibreboard Corporation; Crown
Cork & Seal Company, Inc.; Combustion Engineering, Inc.;
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Defendants.
No. 91-1446.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Argued Oct. 28, 1991.
Decided June 18, 1992.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE 970 F.2D 1292-1301
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
970 F.2d 1292, 22 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1256, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14155, 1992 WL 134696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-celotex-corp-ca4-1992.