Willis v. Celotex Corporation
This text of 970 F.2d 1301 (Willis v. Celotex Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
970 F.2d 1301
Daniel A. WILLIS; Carolyn W. Willis; Herman L. Mensing,
Jr.; Frances K. Mensing; Vincent H. Lewis; Ruby
B. Lewis; Elwood F. Hamlet; Lois D.
Hamlet, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
and
Richard L. Taylor; Mary S. Taylor; William F. Cobb;
Lillie P. Cobb; Roy B. Bass; Susan R. Bass, Plaintiffs,
v.
The CELOTEX CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation; Eagle-Picher
Industries, Inc.; Armstrong World Industries, Inc.; GAF
Corporation; Keene Corporation; Standard Insulations,
Inc.; Raymark Industries, Inc.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.;
H.K. Porter Company, Inc.; Fibreboard Corporation; Crown
Cork & Seal Company, Inc.; Combustion Engineering, Inc.;
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Defendants.
No. 91-1446.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Aug. 7, 1992.
ORDER
Appellees have filed a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc. Appellants have filed a response to the petition.
The Court grants the petition for rehearing and withdraws the published opinion of this Court filed June 18, 1992. Appellees' suggestion for rehearing en banc is held in abeyance pending further action by this Court.
Entered at the direction of Judge Wilkins with the concurrence of Judge Russell and Judge Ward, United States District Judge sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
970 F.2d 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-celotex-corporation-ca4-1992.