FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Power of court
11 U.S.C. § 105
Title11 — Bankruptcy
Chapter1 — GENERAL PROVISIONS
This text of 11 U.S.C. § 105 (Power of court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 105.
Text
(a)The court may issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title. No provision of this title providing for the raising of an issue by a party in interest shall be construed to preclude the court from, sua sponte, taking any action or making any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process.
(b)Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a court may not appoint a receiver in a case under this title.
(c)The ability of any district judge or other officer or employee of a district court to exercise any of the authority or responsibilities conferred upon the court under this title shall be determined by reference to the provisions relating to such jud
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.
549 U.S. 365 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Zerand-Bernal Group, Inc. v. Cox
23 F.3d 159 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
In Re Arthur Carol Sanford, Debtor. United States of America v. Arthur Carol Sanford
979 F.2d 1511 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)
Hendrix v. Page
986 F.2d 195 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
Coggin v. Coggin (In re Coggin)
30 F.3d 1443 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)
In Re Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Debtors. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Maryland v. State of West Virginia, Michigan School Class Action, County of Wayne, Michigan, and B.C. Hydro & Electric
285 F.3d 522 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
FL Dept. of Revenue v. Gregg Takafumi Omine
485 F.3d 1305 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)
Educational Credit Management Corp. v. Mersmann (In Re Mersmann)
505 F.3d 1033 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)
In re Brunson
486 B.R. 759 (N.D. Texas, 2013)
Fisher v. Apostolou
155 F.3d 876 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
In re Jefferson County
491 B.R. 277 (N.D. Alabama, 2013)
Church Joint Venture, L.P. v. Blasingame (In re Blasingame)
559 B.R. 676 (Sixth Circuit, 2016)
In re Dorsey
476 B.R. 261 (C.D. California, 2012)
In re Bell
476 B.R. 168 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2012)
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Verizon Communications Inc.
479 B.R. 405 (N.D. Texas, 2012)
In re Kwiatkowski
486 B.R. 409 (E.D. Michigan, 2013)
Brown v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. (In re Brown)
477 B.R. 915 (S.D. Georgia, 2012)
United States v. Transport Administrative Services
260 F.3d 909 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)
In re Keziah
53 B.R. 116 (W.D. North Carolina, 1985)
United Independent School District v. Vitro Asset Corp. (In re Vitro Asset Corp.)
539 B.R. 108 (N.D. Texas, 2015)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2555; Pub. L. 98–353, title I, §118, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 344; Pub. L. 99–554, title II, §203, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3097; Pub. L. 103–394, title I, §104(a), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4108; Pub. L. 109–8, title IV, §440, Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 114; Pub. L. 111–327, §2(a)(3), Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3557.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
senate report no. 95–989
Section 105 is derived from section 2a (15) of present law [section 11(a)(15) of former title 11], with two changes. First, the limitation on the power of a bankruptcy judge (the power to enjoin a court being reserved to the district judge) is removed as inconsistent with the increased powers and jurisdiction of the new bankruptcy court. Second, the bankruptcy judge is prohibited from appointing a receiver in a case under title 11 under any circumstances. The bankruptcy code has ample provision for the appointment of a trustee when needed. Appointment of a receiver would simply circumvent the established procedures.
This section is also an authorization, as required under 28 U.S.C. 2283, for a court of the United States to stay the action of a State court. As such, Toucey v. New York Life Insurance Company, 314 U.S. 118 (1941), is overruled.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, referred to in subsec. (d)(2), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Amendments
2010—Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 111–327 inserted "may" after "Procedure," in introductory provisions.
2005—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 109–8, §440(1), struck out ", may" after "party in interest" in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 109–8, §440(2), added par. (1) and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: "hold a status conference regarding any case or proceeding under this title after notice to the parties in interest; and".
1994—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–394 added subsec. (d).
1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–554 inserted at end "No provision of this title providing for the raising of an issue by a party in interest shall be construed to preclude the court from, sua sponte, taking any action or making any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process."
1984—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 98–353, §118(1), struck out "bankruptcy" before "court".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–353, §118(2), added subsec. (c).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–394 effective Oct. 22, 1994, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before Oct. 22, 1994, see section 702 of Pub. L. 103–394, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Effective date and applicability of amendment by Pub. L. 99–554 dependent upon the judicial district involved, see section 302(d), (e) of Pub. L. 99–554, set out as a note under section 581 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective July 10, 1984, see section 122(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as an Effective Date note under section 151 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
senate report no. 95–989
Section 105 is derived from section 2a (15) of present law [section 11(a)(15) of former title 11], with two changes. First, the limitation on the power of a bankruptcy judge (the power to enjoin a court being reserved to the district judge) is removed as inconsistent with the increased powers and jurisdiction of the new bankruptcy court. Second, the bankruptcy judge is prohibited from appointing a receiver in a case under title 11 under any circumstances. The bankruptcy code has ample provision for the appointment of a trustee when needed. Appointment of a receiver would simply circumvent the established procedures.
This section is also an authorization, as required under 28 U.S.C. 2283, for a court of the United States to stay the action of a State court. As such, Toucey v. New York Life Insurance Company, 314 U.S. 118 (1941), is overruled.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, referred to in subsec. (d)(2), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Amendments
2010—Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 111–327 inserted "may" after "Procedure," in introductory provisions.
2005—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 109–8, §440(1), struck out ", may" after "party in interest" in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 109–8, §440(2), added par. (1) and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: "hold a status conference regarding any case or proceeding under this title after notice to the parties in interest; and".
1994—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–394 added subsec. (d).
1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–554 inserted at end "No provision of this title providing for the raising of an issue by a party in interest shall be construed to preclude the court from, sua sponte, taking any action or making any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process."
1984—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 98–353, §118(1), struck out "bankruptcy" before "court".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–353, §118(2), added subsec. (c).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–394 effective Oct. 22, 1994, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before Oct. 22, 1994, see section 702 of Pub. L. 103–394, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Effective date and applicability of amendment by Pub. L. 99–554 dependent upon the judicial district involved, see section 302(d), (e) of Pub. L. 99–554, set out as a note under section 581 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective July 10, 1984, see section 122(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as an Effective Date note under section 151 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/105.