Willingham v. State

48 So. 3d 173, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17994, 2010 WL 4772131
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 24, 2010·No. No. 2D10-53·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Joe Nathan Willingham challenges his convictions and sentences for aggravated battery with a firearm causing great bodily harm and shooting at, within, or into a vehicle. We affirm his convictions and sentences without further comment. We remand for the limited purpose of correcting a scrivener’s error which appears on the face of the written judgment. Although the record reflects that Willingham was convicted after a jury trial, the written judgment erroneously indicates that he entered a no contest plea. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to correct this error. See Newson v. State, 867 So.2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

ALTENBERND and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willingham v. State, 48 So. 3d 173, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17994, 2010 WL 4772131 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

48 So. 3d 173 (Willingham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RAFAEL A. CARRION v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
Bryant v. State
154 So. 3d 1164 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Lenker v. State
151 So. 3d 1273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Wolfork v. State
147 So. 3d 627 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Lunsford v. State
141 So. 3d 1254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Evans v. State
138 So. 3d 1201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Harrell v. State
76 So. 3d 353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Mann v. State
62 So. 3d 1240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Yoder v. State
62 So. 3d 1183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)