Willingham v. State
This text of 48 So. 3d 173 (Willingham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joe Nathan Willingham challenges his convictions and sentences for aggravated battery with a firearm causing great bodily harm and shooting at, within, or into a vehicle. We affirm his convictions and sentences without further comment. We remand for the limited purpose of correcting a scrivener’s error which appears on the face of the written judgment. Although the record reflects that Willingham was convicted after a jury trial, the written judgment erroneously indicates that he entered a no contest plea. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to correct this error. See Newson v. State, 867 So.2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 So. 3d 173, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17994, 2010 WL 4772131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willingham-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.