Wolfork v. State

147 So. 3d 627, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14245, 2014 WL 4494310
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 12, 2014
Docket2D13-4413
StatusPublished

This text of 147 So. 3d 627 (Wolfork v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wolfork v. State, 147 So. 3d 627, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14245, 2014 WL 4494310 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

LaROSE, Judge.

Ray A. Wolfork, Jr., appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. We affirm without comment but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error in the judgment. The judgment lists a conviction for aggravated battery (firearm). See § 784.045(l)(a)(2), Fla. Stat. (2003). However, the plea and judgment were for aggravated battery (great bodily harm). See § 784.045(l)(a)(l). We remand for the trial court to amend Mr. Wolfork’s judgment accordingly. See Willingham v. State, 48 So.3d 173,173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

KHOUZAM and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Willingham v. State
48 So. 3d 173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 So. 3d 627, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14245, 2014 WL 4494310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfork-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.