Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lunsford v. State

Lunsford v. State

141 So. 3d 1254, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 9, 2014
DocketNo. 2D13-2670
StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 3d 1254 (Lunsford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lunsford v. State, 141 So. 3d 1254, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

BLACK, Judge.

We affirm McKenzie Lunsford’s convictions and sentences without comment. However, we remand for entry of a corrected judgment reflecting that Lunsford pleaded only to counts 1, 2, and 3, and was convicted after a jury trial of counts 4 and 5. See Willingham v. State, 48 So.3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

KHOUZAM, J., and BAUMANN, HERBERT J., JR., Associate Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Willingham v. State
48 So. 3d 173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 So. 3d 1254, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lunsford-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.