Mann v. State
Opinion
We affirm George Mann’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon without comment. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error apparent on the face of the written judgment. While the record reflects that Mann was convicted of robbery with a weapon, the written judgment erroneously indicates he was convicted of robbery with a firearm. See Willingham v. State, 48 So.3d 173, 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Carter v. State, 32 So.3d 67, 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).
Judgment and sentence affirmed; remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
62 So. 3d 1240 (Mann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.