Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mann v. State

Mann v. State

62 So. 3d 1240, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8896, 2011 WL 2342512
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 2011
Docket2D10-2920
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 62 So. 3d 1240 (Mann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mann v. State, 62 So. 3d 1240, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8896, 2011 WL 2342512 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

BLACK, Judge.

We affirm George Mann’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon without comment. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error apparent on the face of the written judgment. While the record reflects that Mann was convicted of robbery with a weapon, the written judgment erroneously indicates he was convicted of robbery with a firearm. See Willingham v. State, 48 So.3d 173, 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Carter v. State, 32 So.3d 67, 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Judgment and sentence affirmed; remanded with instructions.

DAVIS and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKnight v. State
198 So. 3d 974 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Sutton v. State
90 So. 3d 885 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Harrell v. State
76 So. 3d 353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 So. 3d 1240, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8896, 2011 WL 2342512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.