Mann v. State

62 So. 3d 1240, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8896, 2011 WL 2342512
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 15, 2011·No. 2D10-2920·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BLACK, Judge.

We affirm George Mann’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon without comment. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error apparent on the face of the written judgment. While the record reflects that Mann was convicted of robbery with a weapon, the written judgment erroneously indicates he was convicted of robbery with a firearm. See Willingham v. State, 48 So.3d 173, 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Carter v. State, 32 So.3d 67, 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Judgment and sentence affirmed; remanded with instructions.

DAVIS and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mann v. State, 62 So. 3d 1240, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8896, 2011 WL 2342512 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

62 So. 3d 1240 (Mann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKnight v. State
198 So. 3d 974 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Sutton v. State
90 So. 3d 885 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Harrell v. State
76 So. 3d 353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)