Williams v. State
291 S.W.3d 377, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1235, 2009 WL 2750973
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1703 →
Opinion
ORDER
Christopher Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for *378 post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 291 S.W.3d 377, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1235, 2009 WL 2750973 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
291 S.W.3d 377 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. State
291 S.W.3d 377 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)