Williams v. State

280 S.W.3d 780, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 456, 2009 WL 983056
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1703
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 14, 2009·No. ED 91106·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ken Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 280 S.W.3d 780, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 456, 2009 WL 983056 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

280 S.W.3d 780 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.