Wilfredo Segarra Miranda, as Trustee for the Estate of Eduardo Rivera Mercado v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico
DecidedJune 15, 2018
Docket17-00286
StatusUnknown

This text of Wilfredo Segarra Miranda, as Trustee for the Estate of Eduardo Rivera Mercado v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (Wilfredo Segarra Miranda, as Trustee for the Estate of Eduardo Rivera Mercado v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilfredo Segarra Miranda, as Trustee for the Estate of Eduardo Rivera Mercado v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, (prb 2018).

Opinion

1 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

3 IN RE: CASE NO. 15-09902 (MCF)

4 EDUARDO RIVERA MERCADO CHAPTER 7

Debtor 6

7 ADVERSARY CASE NO. 17-00286 WILFREDO SEGARRA MIRANDA, AS (MCF) 8 TRUSTEE FOR THE ESTATE OF EDUARDO RIVERA MERCADO 9 Plaintiff 10 V. 11

12 BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO

13 Defendant

15 OPINION AND ORDER 16 Before the Court is plaintiff Chapter 7 Trustee Wilfredo Segarra Miranda’s (hereinafter 17 “Trustee”) request for judgment on the pleadings regarding avoidance and preservation actions. 18 The Court must address whether the Trustee may avoid an unrecorded mortgage and preserve it 19 for the benefit of the estate. Insomuch as Puerto Rico law provides that a mortgage is inexistent 20 unless it is registered, the Trustee may not avoid an unrecorded mortgage. For the reasons that 21 follow, the Court denies the Trustee’s request for judgment on the pleadings and dismisses the 22 23 adversary case against defendant Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (hereinafter “Banco Popular”). 24 Procedural History 25 The Debtor, Eduardo Rivera Mercado (hereinafter “the Debtor”), acquired real property 26 located in Orocovis, Puerto Rico on August 21, 2002. In May 2014, the Debtor executed a note 27 and mortgage deed over the real property in favor of Metro Island Mortgage, Inc., which was later transferred to Banco Popular. The mortgage deed was never presented in the Puerto Rico 1 2 Property Registry for the purpose of recording a lien on the real property. 3 The Debtor filed for bankruptcy under chapter 7 on December 15, 2015 (Case No. 15- 4 09902, Docket No.1). Subsequently, the Trustee filed an adversary action for avoidance of the 5 unrecorded mortgage and to preserve the avoided mortgage for the benefit of the estate. The 6 Trustee moved for judgment on the pleadings against Banco Popular (Docket No. 10). Banco 7 Popular opposed (Docket No. 16). 8 Standard for Judgment on the Pleadings 9 10 Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, made applicable in bankruptcy 11 proceedings through Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012, provides that “[a]fter the pleadings are closed but 12 within such time as not to delay the trial, any party may move for judgment on the pleadings.” 13 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c).1 The standard for evaluating a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the 14 pleadings is essentially the same as that for deciding a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure 15 to state a cause of action. Under both Rule 12(b)(6) and 12(c) standards, “[t]he trial court must 16 accept all of the nonmovant's well-pleaded factual averments as true, and draw all reasonable 17 18 inferences in his favor.” Rivera–Gomez v. de Castro, 843 F.2d 631, 635 (1st Cir.1998). See also 19 AIG Prop. Cas. Co. v. Cosby, No. 17-1505, 2018 WL 2730762, at 1 (1st Cir. June 7, 2018). Only 20 a complaint that states a plausible claim for relief can survive a motion to dismiss under Rule 21 12(b)(6) or 12(c). Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009). 22 Discussion 23 The Trustee argues that the unrecorded mortgage held by Banco Popular over the 24 25 Debtor’s property is an avoidable transfer and therefore the lien is preserved in favor of the 26 1 Unless expressly stated otherwise, all references to “Bankruptcy Code” or to specific statutory sections shall be to the 27 Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, as amended by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”), Pub. L. No. 109–8, 119 Stat. 23, 11 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. All references to “Bankruptcy Rules” shall be to the estate, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 544(a)(3) and 551 (Docket No. 10, at 6). In support of his 1 2 argument, the Trustee relies on In re Traverse, 753 F.3d 19 (1st Cir. 2014) and on Segarra v. 3 Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, Case No. 16-00123, Docket No. 42, (Bankr. D.P.R., Aug. 23, 4 2017). 5 Banco Popular opposed the request stating that the mere execution of the mortgage 6 without recordation does not constitute an avoidable transfer. Banco Popular added that the 7 Trustee failed to acknowledge the recent holding by this Court in Segarra v. Schwarz Reitman, 8 Adv. No. 15-00020 (MFC), which held that a trustee may not assert an avoidance or preservation 9 10 action under 11 U.S.C. §§ 544 & 551, when a mortgage is unrecorded in the Property Registry 11 in Puerto Rico.2 12 The issue presented is whether an unrecorded mortgage may be avoided as a transfer, 13 under 11 U.S.C. § 544(a), which states in its relevant portions: 14 (a) The trustee . . . may avoid any transfer of property of the debtor or any 15 obligation incurred by the debtor that is voidable by— . . . 16 (3) a bona fide purchaser of real property. . .from the debtor, against whom applicable law permits such transfer to be perfected, that obtains the 17 status of a bona fide purchaser and has perfected such transfer at the time 18 of the commencement of the case, whether or not such a purchaser exists.

19 11 U.S.C. § 544(a). 20 21

22 2 Banco Popular also claims Debtor is an indispensable party under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7019 in the adversary action because the Debtor is the owner of the real property. Under Puerto Rico Law, a party may not impact a property owner’s right, like recording a mortgage, without a property owner being included in the action. Melendez Quinones v. Citimortgage, Inc., Case No. 15-00255 23 (MCF), Docket No. 18, (Bankr. D.P.R, December 30, 2015); Segarra v. Schwarz Reitman, Case No. 15-00020 (MCF), Docket No. 56, (Bankr. D.P.R, November 29, 2016); Metropolitan Marble Corp. v. Pichardo, 145 D.P.R. 607 (1998). Generally, when a 24 property ownership is registered in the property registry, all parties therein must be included in the litigation involving that property. Metropolitan Marble Corp. v. Pichardo, 145 D.P.R. 607 (1998)(A judicial proceeding for the execution of judgment and 25 public sale of a jointly owned real property is void when one of the co-owners is absent from the litigation.). See also Rodriguez Rodriguez v. Moreno Rodriguez, 135 D.P.R. 623, 627 (1994)(an indispensable party is one that could have his rights or interests affected at the moment that judgment is issued). Even parties who stand to benefit from litigation have a right to be heard in the 26 action to ensure that the plaintiff is successful in obtaining a favorable judgment. Melendez Quinones, Docket No. 18, at 4. The Trustee may not avoid a mortgage in the Property Registry without including the Debtor in the litigation because it impacts his 27 property rights.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Butner v. United States
440 U.S. 48 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Martin Rivera-Gomez v. Rafael Adolfo De Castro
843 F.2d 631 (First Circuit, 1988)
Soto-Rios v. Banco Popular De Puerto Rico
662 F.3d 112 (First Circuit, 2011)
Antilles Cement Corp. v. Cemex De Puerto Rico, Inc.
670 F.3d 310 (First Circuit, 2012)
In Re Harbour House Operating Corp.
26 B.R. 324 (D. Massachusetts, 1982)
Degiacomo v. Traverse
753 F.3d 19 (First Circuit, 2014)
Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
969 N.E.2d 1118 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2012)
Fitzhugh v. Love's ex'or
10 Va. 5 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1806)
Rodríguez Rodríguez v. Moreno Rodríguez
135 P.R. Dec. 623 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1994)
Metropolitan Marble Corp. v. Pichardo Vicioso
145 P.R. Dec. 607 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wilfredo Segarra Miranda, as Trustee for the Estate of Eduardo Rivera Mercado v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilfredo-segarra-miranda-as-trustee-for-the-estate-of-eduardo-rivera-prb-2018.