FEDERAL · 11 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—THE ESTATE
Automatic preservation of avoided transfer
11 U.S.C. § 551
Title11 — Bankruptcy
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—THE ESTATE
This text of 11 U.S.C. § 551 (Automatic preservation of avoided transfer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
11 U.S.C. § 551.
Text
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re: Pamela Knapper, F/k/a Pamela Jones, Pamela Knapper William C. Miller v. Bankers Trust Co., as Trustee for Amresco Residential Securities Corp
407 F.3d 573 (Third Circuit, 2005)
Brian Bash v. Textron Financial Corporation
834 F.3d 651 (Sixth Circuit, 2016)
In Re Gerald Dale Burns and Linda Jane Burns, Debtors. Andrew W. Suhar v. Gerald Dale Burns and Linda Jane Burns, Imc Mortgage Company
322 F.3d 421 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
In the Matter Of: Lewis C. Leonard Debtor. Appeal Of: Robert Barker and Theodore Lieblich
125 F.3d 543 (Seventh Circuit, 1997)
In Re: Stergios Messina v.
687 F.3d 74 (Third Circuit, 2012)
Taffi v. United States (In Re Taffi)
144 B.R. 105 (C.D. California, 1992)
Mellon Bank (East), N.A. v. Glick (In Re Integrated Testing Products Corp.)
69 B.R. 901 (D. New Jersey, 1987)
Connelly v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.
61 B.R. 748 (W.D. New York, 1986)
Simonson v. First Bank of Greater Pittston
758 F.2d 103 (Third Circuit, 1985)
Weiman v. Stopher (In Re Weiman)
22 B.R. 49 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Helms v. Metro. Life Ins. Co. (In re O'Malley)
601 B.R. 629 (N.D. Illinois, 2019)
Rhiel v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Phalen)
445 B.R. 830 (S.D. Ohio, 2011)
Terlecky v. Chase Home Finance, LLC (In Re Sauer)
417 B.R. 523 (S.D. Ohio, 2009)
In Re Landmark
48 B.R. 626 (D. Minnesota, 1985)
In Re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Foundation, Inc.
237 B.R. 518 (District of Columbia, 1999)
Dwyer v. Rockland Trust Co. (In re Mammola)
474 B.R. 23 (D. Massachusetts, 2012)
Mbazira v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (In re Mbazira)
518 B.R. 11 (D. Massachusetts, 2014)
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. TSG Equity Fund, L.P. (In Re Envisionet Computer Services, Inc.)
276 B.R. 1 (D. Maine, 2002)
Logan v. Columbus Postal Employees Credit Union, Inc. (In Re Trott)
91 B.R. 808 (S.D. Ohio, 1988)
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Lassman (In Re Demore)
844 F.3d 292 (First Circuit, 2016)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2602.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
legislative statements
Section 551 is adopted from the House bill and the alternative in the Senate amendment is rejected. The section is clarified to indicate that a transfer avoided or a lien that is void is preserved for the benefit of the estate, but only with respect to property of the estate. This prevents the trustee from asserting an avoided tax lien against after acquired property of the debtor.
senate report no. 95–989
This section is a change from present law. It specifies that any avoided transfer is automatically preserved for the benefit of the estate. Under current law, the court must determine whether or not the transfer should be preserved. The operation of the section is automatic, unlike current law, even though preservation may not benefit the estate in every instance. A preserved lien may be abandoned by the trustee under proposed 11 U.S.C. 554 if the preservation does not benefit the estate. The section as a whole prevents junior lienors from improving their position at the expense of the estate when a senior lien is avoided.
legislative statements
Section 551 is adopted from the House bill and the alternative in the Senate amendment is rejected. The section is clarified to indicate that a transfer avoided or a lien that is void is preserved for the benefit of the estate, but only with respect to property of the estate. This prevents the trustee from asserting an avoided tax lien against after acquired property of the debtor.
senate report no. 95–989
This section is a change from present law. It specifies that any avoided transfer is automatically preserved for the benefit of the estate. Under current law, the court must determine whether or not the transfer should be preserved. The operation of the section is automatic, unlike current law, even though preservation may not benefit the estate in every instance. A preserved lien may be abandoned by the trustee under proposed 11 U.S.C. 554 if the preservation does not benefit the estate. The section as a whole prevents junior lienors from improving their position at the expense of the estate when a senior lien is avoided.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 U.S.C. § 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/11/551.