White v. State

408 S.W.3d 801, 2013 WL 5232333, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1059
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 646
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 17, 2013·No. No. ED 98926·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrence White appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order, Judgment and Decree denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed [802]*802the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 408 S.W.3d 801, 2013 WL 5232333, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1059 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

408 S.W.3d 801 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.