White v. State

333 S.W.3d 543, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 355, 2011 WL 902039
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 2011·No. ED 95292·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charaty “Baby Doll” White (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying her motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing.

*544 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 333 S.W.3d 543, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 355, 2011 WL 902039 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

333 S.W.3d 543 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jordan v. State
333 S.W.3d 543 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)