White v. State

359 S.W.3d 541, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 213, 2012 WL 549490
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 2012·No. ED 96476·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Irven White appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Mo. R. Civ. P. (2011).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. (2011), unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. State, 359 S.W.3d 541, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 213, 2012 WL 549490 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

359 S.W.3d 541 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mabery v. State
359 S.W.3d 541 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)