White v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

White v. State

273 S.W.3d 580, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 12, 2009 WL 69276

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 13, 2009

DocketED 90651

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 S.W.3d 580 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. State, 273 S.W.3d 580, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 12, 2009 WL 69276 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven J. White (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to call two available witnesses and obtain and introduce documentary evidence to support his alibi defense and motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI