KOCH GENERAL CONTRACTOR v. Cooper

Missouri Court of Appeals

KOCH GENERAL CONTRACTOR v. Cooper

273 S.W.3d 580, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 11, 2009 WL 69275

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 13, 2009·No. ED 90467·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Koch General Contractor (“Contractor”) appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of James Cooper (“Owner”) on Contractor’s claim for breach of its contract with Owner to rebuild a porch and deck on Owner’s home. We find that the trial court did not err in permitting Owner to submit an affirmative converse verdict director.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b). 1

1

. We deny Owner’s motions to dismiss Contractor’s appeal, which were taken with the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Koch General Contractor (“Contractor”) appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of James Cooper (“Owner”) on Contractor’s claim for breach of its contract with Owner to rebuild a porch and deck on Owner’s home. We find that the trial court did not err in permitting Owner to submit an affirmative converse verdict director.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b). 1

1

. We deny Owner’s motions to dismiss Contractor’s appeal, which were taken with the case.

KOCH GENERAL CONTRACTOR v. Cooper, 273 S.W.3d 580, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 11, 2009 WL 69275 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

273 S.W.3d 580 (KOCH GENERAL CONTRACTOR v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related